Too many samples of video footage have been seen, and yet no actions taken. The aliens freely enter our atmosphere, and fly around the restricted air space of various countries. If the UFO was some humane aircraft, such aircraft would be destroyed right away. We have all seen what happens to those human aircraft violating the air space of countries that protect their sovereignty.
Their shapes are always different, some look like silver spheres, others like Tic-Tac candy, yet there is no clear footage of what their bodies look like either. Let us not confuse alien space crafts with the bodies of the angels. Angels are usually covered in light, and send shockwaves of light before they fly up to heaven. Consider aliens do the opposite, some of those UFOs hide in volcanoes, and others in the sea.
What is the point of having nukes is my question? Such weapons are clearly obsolete, and a very high danger to humankind. So I went and asked AI, "How would the world be without nuclear weapons, and without the global warming effects nuclear plants cause?" This is what ChatGPT responded:
"A world without nuclear weapons and without the environmental concerns associated with nuclear power plants would likely be a safer and more sustainable place in several ways:
Reduced Risk of Nuclear Conflict: Without nuclear weapons, the risk of nuclear conflict or accidental nuclear war would be significantly diminished. This would make the world a safer place, as the devastating consequences of nuclear war would no longer be a looming threat.
Environmental Benefits: The elimination of nuclear weapons would also lead to the elimination of nuclear testing, which has significant environmental and health consequences. Additionally, without the need for the production and maintenance of nuclear weapons, there would be less demand for the mining and processing of uranium, which is associated with environmental and health risks.
Climate Change Mitigation: The elimination of nuclear power plants would remove concerns about nuclear accidents, such as those seen in Chernobyl and Fukushima. However, it's important to note that nuclear power is a low-carbon energy source that can help mitigate climate change. In a world without nuclear power, there would be a greater reliance on fossil fuels for energy production, which could exacerbate global warming.
Increased Investment in Renewable Energy: Without nuclear power, there may be a greater incentive for countries to invest in renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and hydroelectric power. This transition to cleaner energy sources could help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change.
Improved Nuclear Non-Proliferation: The absence of nuclear weapons could lead to greater international cooperation in nuclear non-proliferation efforts. Nations may be more willing to work together to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, leading to a more stable world order.
Resource Reallocation: The resources that are currently allocated to nuclear weapons and nuclear power could be redirected towards other pressing global issues, such as healthcare, education, poverty alleviation, and scientific research.
However, it's important to recognize that the complete elimination of nuclear weapons and nuclear power would come with challenges and potential drawbacks:
Energy Security: The elimination of nuclear power would require countries to find alternative sources of energy to meet their electricity demands. This transition could be challenging, and some nations might increase their reliance on fossil fuels in the short term.
Nuclear Technology for Peaceful Purposes: While the elimination of nuclear weapons is generally seen as positive, nuclear technology has also been used for peaceful purposes, such as medical imaging and treatments, as well as scientific research. Careful consideration would be needed to ensure that these beneficial applications are not lost.
Geopolitical Dynamics: The global balance of power could shift without nuclear weapons, and international relations might change. Some countries may feel less secure, leading to increased conventional arms races.
In conclusion, a world without nuclear weapons and the associated global warming effects of nuclear power would likely be a more peaceful and environmentally sustainable place. However, the transition away from nuclear power would require careful planning to ensure energy security and minimize the impact on climate change. Additionally, addressing the complex geopolitical and security challenges associated with nuclear disarmament would be an ongoing process."
I mean, they don't necessarily have to rely on fossil fuels, since electrolysis is a cheap way of generating hydrogen.